Sunday, March 15, 2009

Talkin bout tech

I’ve just read an interesting article in Harper's, “The Last Book Party: Publishing drinks to a life after death”. In it, the author is attending a German publishing festival where publishing houses bid for the international rights to the year’s ‘hottest’ new books. What is interesting about the article is that the author is expressing a doubt I myself have about the future of the publishing industry and the different ways in which both authors and publishers are dealing with it. The author, Gideon Lewis-Kraus, also covers some ground familiar in Epstein. Lewis-Kraus creates a vision of the older generation of publishers as people genuinely interested in literature for literature’s sake, content with small profit margins with the greater goal of being purveyors of thought. This environment of people actually taking pride in their work was transformed when entities like Viacom and CBS entered the mix and “were insulted by margins of 5 percent”. We have all read about how this has created a craving for the next bestseller and authors receiving huge advances usually out of proportion with how well their book will actually sell. New technology, and more importantly the author’s ability to manipulate this technology is changing the focus once again. One author at the Fair, in a move similar to Stephen King’s online novel, has put his entire catalog on his website. He quips that he is “stealing from myself”. I find it interesting that by being on the vanguard of this techno-movement, the author forces the pendulum to swing back the other way, away from huge advances and inflated expectations. Because, at the moment, there is not an adequate system in place to create revenue for authors using technology to spread their work, we may be left with those authors that are true artists and whose greatest passion is to create great literature. Conversely, we may get to the point where everyone with an internet connection thinks that their work is worthy of being read to the masses. It will be interesting to see in the coming years how the publishing industry continues to navigate the issues arising from the use of newer technologies.

1 comment:

  1. It seems as though everyone is weary of technologies influence over the publishing industry, however, is there any way that it could actually have a positive effect? As long as people have to pay to read, will they read more with the accessibility that technology creates?
    For example, a good friend of mine always hated carrying around books, especially anthologies, to the point that it would be frustrating to read. It's difficult to hold a book when standing on the New York subway in rush hour traffic. However, since she got the Kindle she has been reading much more. Since she does not have to plan ahead on having reading material, her ability to read is more spontaneous and has overall increased her ability to read. Furthermore, she reads short stories and poetry on her iPhone, which she can comfortably do while spending two hours standing in the drudgery of New York's work commute.
    Of course, the thought of replacing books with Kindles and iPhones is depressing, but one must think from the point of view of the average American and not a class of book -loving, binding-smelling English majors. What the average American wants is convenience and entertainment. If they could obtain this from reading, maybe (maybe) they would read more.

    ReplyDelete